current

Chapter 17 - Wilhelmina’s criminal trial begins

Wilhelmina rejected an early plea requiring admission she intentionally used cold-water punishment to compel obedience.

She said:

Security conditioning.

Trial.

The prosecution showed:

Smart-lock logs.

Notebook.

Staff testimony.

Amity’s forensic interview admitted only under appropriate child-witness rules and corroborated heavily by records.

No repeated live testimony if unnecessary.

Then Wilhelmina’s own videos.

One showed Amity shivering.

Wilhelmina’s voice:

“Tell me the address.”

Amity:

“I don’t know.”

“Again.”

Amity crying.

“Stop crying. Think.”

No threat of death.

No graphic abuse.

Still difficult to watch.

Another:

Amity dropping towel.

Wilhelmina:

“Reset.”

Camera ended before water.

Then notebook.

Cold improves recall after consequence.

No professional basis.

Defense presented a security consultant who said stress inoculation exists in adult protective training.

Prosecutor asked:

“Do you recommend pouring ice water on eight-year-olds?”

“No.”

That was enough.

Then confinement.

Defense:

Laundry-room lock existed for security.

Prosecution:

Logs showed it locked during punishments.

Wilhelmina kept key.

Amity could not leave.

Then signature authorization.

She admitted creating document.

“I summarized authority Valerian already gave me.”

Prosecutor:

“Why paste his signature?”

“To show authorization source.”

“Why not attach original?”

No good answer.

May you like

Mixed criminal issues.

Jury would decide.

Related Stories

Other posts