current

Chapter 4 - My first mistake

I did exactly what my lawyer later told me not to do.

At 11:47 that night, after Gigi finally fell asleep beside me, I opened my laptop.

I wrote an email to the company’s bank.

Our outside accountant.

The two independent board advisers.

My father.

My mother.

Arthur.

Subject:

Immediate suspension of refinancing discussions

I wrote:

Given today’s assault on my daughter by Arthur and the family’s subsequent attempt to misrepresent the incident, I will not provide any guarantee or consent to the proposed financing. I also request that all current draws on the revolving facility be suspended pending review of potential misconduct by management.

That last sentence was the mistake.

I had grounds to refuse my personal guarantee.

Absolutely.

I had grounds to request a governance review.

Yes.

I did not have unilateral authority to tell the bank to suspend ordinary company draws based on a family assault without evidence of financial misconduct.

The bank reacted cautiously.

Monday-morning working-capital access was temporarily paused while counsel clarified authority.

Payroll was due Tuesday.

My father called at 7:02 a.m.

“What the hell have you done?”

I sat at my kitchen table.

Gigi ate banana slices in her pajamas.

“I’m not guaranteeing anything.”

“That is your right.”

Interesting.

“Then?”

“You told our bank there may be misconduct.”

“There may be.”

“Based on what?”

“Arthur’s behavior.”

“That is not financial misconduct.”

He was right.

I hated it.

“You’ve protected him for years.”

“That is not a bank covenant.”

Also right.

“I want an independent review.”

“Then call a board meeting.”

I had skipped a step because I wanted something immediate to happen.

Systems move slower than rage.

I had tried to use finance as consequence because that was power I possessed.

By nine, my corporate attorney called.

“Clara.”

“I know.”

“Do you?”

“Yes.”

“You can refuse the guarantee.”

“Yes.”

“You can demand a special board meeting under the shareholder agreement.”

“Yes.”

“You cannot casually imply bank fraud because your brother committed an unrelated assault.”

“I know.”

“Good.”

Apparently lawyers enjoy making you say it.

I sent a corrective email:

My prior message should not be read as an allegation of financial fraud. My concern is governance risk related to management conduct. I request a special board review. I do not consent to or guarantee the proposed refinancing. Ordinary authorized company operations should continue pending board action.

The bank restored access after counsel confirmed.

Payroll went out.

No employee lost wages because I was angry.

Barely.

That became my meaningful mistake.

Not equivalent to Arthur hitting Gigi.

Still mine.

May you like

I had nearly used one hundred twenty people’s livelihoods as leverage in a family war.

That was not the kind of mother I wanted Gigi watching either.

Related Stories

Other posts